Photovoltaics is the science and technology of converting sunlight directly into electricity. At a basic level, it works by using materials that absorb photons (light particles) and use that energy to generate moving electrical charges. Those charges are then separated and collected to produce usable current.
While the idea sounds simple, “solar energy” is not one single technology. It is a broad field made up of multiple material systems and device designs, each with different physics, manufacturing methods, costs, and limitations. Understanding these categories helps explain why some solar panels dominate the market, while others are still in development or only used in specialized applications.
The most widely used solar technology today is silicon-based photovoltaics. These are the dark blue or black panels commonly seen on rooftops and solar farms.
Silicon solar cells work using a p–n junction, a structure where two regions of silicon are engineered to have different electrical properties. When sunlight enters the material, it creates charge carriers (electrons and holes), and an internal electric field pushes them in opposite directions, generating electricity [9].
Figure 1: Monocrystalline silicon solar cells versus polycrystalline ones [12]
There are two main types:
Monocrystalline silicon is made from a single, continuous crystal structure. It is highly efficient and long-lasting, which is why it dominates modern installations.
Polycrystalline silicon is made from multiple crystal grains. It is slightly less efficient but historically cheaper to produce, and is still used in some applications.
Recent advances in flexible silicon solar cells have made it possible to combine the high efficiency of traditional silicon photovoltaics with the versatility of bendable materials. By developing ultra-thin silicon wafers and new fabrication techniques, researchers have created solar cells that can flex without significant performance loss. These innovations could enable solar energy to be integrated into wearable devices, vehicles, and curved surfaces where conventional rigid panels are impractical [3].
Thin-film photovoltaics refer to solar cells where the active light-absorbing layer is extremely thin, often hundreds to thousands of times thinner than a human hair. Instead of thick silicon wafers, these devices are built by depositing thin semiconductor layers onto glass, metal, or flexible plastic.
Figure 2: Thin film solar panel that highlights its flexibility [13]
Thin-film technologies include several different material systems:
Cadmium Telluride (CdTe) is one of the most commercially successful thin-film technologies. It absorbs sunlight very strongly, meaning only a small amount of material is needed [2].
CIGS (Copper Indium Gallium Selenide) is another high-performance thin-film material with tunable properties and the potential for flexible solar panels [2].
Amorphous silicon (a-Si) was an early thin-film technology used in smaller devices, though it is less efficient than modern alternatives [6].
Thin-film solar cells are attractive because they can reduce material costs and enable lightweight or flexible designs. However, some versions face challenges in efficiency, long-term stability, or the use of rare or toxic elements.
Organic photovoltaics (OPVs), a subcategory of thin-film photovoltaics, use carbon-based molecules and polymers to absorb light and generate electricity. Instead of rigid crystals like silicon, these materials are more similar in structure to plastics.
A key example of an organic solar cell system is a blend of a donor material and an acceptor material. When light is absorbed, it creates tightly bound excited states. At the interface between donor and acceptor materials, these charges separate and can be collected as current.
Unlike silicon devices, where electric fields drive charge separation, organic solar cells rely heavily on nanoscale material mixing and interface engineering. This makes their internal structure extremely important.
Figure 3: Depiction of 2 types of organic solar cell designs, normal structure versus inverted structure for a specific P3HT:PCBM OSC [14]
Organic photovoltaics offer several advantages. They can be lightweight, flexible, and potentially produced using low-cost printing methods. However, they typically have lower efficiency and are more sensitive to oxygen and moisture, which can degrade performance over time [10].
Because of these tradeoffs, OPVs are often explored for applications where flexibility or ultra-low-cost production matters more than maximum efficiency [10].
Perovskite solar cells (specifically metal-halide perovskites), a subcategory of thin-film photovoltaics, are one of the most rapidly advancing areas in photovoltaics. They use a class of materials called perovskites, often hybrid organic-inorganic compounds with a specific crystal structure [11].
Figure 4: General structure of a perovskite solar cell, including a depiction of the crystalline structure of perovskites [15]
What makes perovskites especially exciting is how efficiently they absorb light and convert it into electricity. In a relatively short time, their lab efficiencies have risen to levels comparable with silicon, which took decades to achieve.
Perovskite materials can also be processed using low-temperature techniques such as solution coating, which opens the door to cheaper and simpler manufacturing [11].
However, there are still major challenges. Many perovskite materials degrade when exposed to moisture, oxygen, heat, or light over time. Stability and long-term durability are therefore the main barriers to widespread commercial deployment. Researchers are actively working on improving material composition and protective device architectures to solve these issues [8].
Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs), a subcategory under thin-film photovoltaics, take a different approach from traditional semiconductors. Instead of relying on a solid material to absorb light directly, they use dye molecules that absorb sunlight and inject electrons into a semiconductor, typically titanium dioxide [7].
Figure 5: General structure and workings of a DSSC [16]
This structure allows DSSCs to work well under low-light conditions and even indoors. They can also be made semi-transparent or colored, which makes them interesting for architectural applications.
However, many DSSCs rely on liquid electrolytes, which can leak or degrade over time, limiting long-term stability [4].
Figure 6: Depiction of general structure and how a quantum dot solar cell works [17]
Quantum dot solar cells use extremely small semiconductor particles, only a few nanometers in size. At this scale, the material’s electronic properties depend strongly on particle size, allowing researchers to tune what wavelengths of light are absorbed.
Quantum dots also offer the possibility of advanced physical effects such as multiple exciton generation, where a single photon could produce more than one electron-hole pair.
While promising, this technology is still developing and faces challenges in stability, toxicity (depending on materials used), and efficiency compared to more mature systems. One of the highest-performing flexible photovoltaic technologies to date is the CsPbI₃ perovskite quantum dot solar cell, which achieved a champion power conversion efficiency of 15.1% and a record 12.3% efficiency in a flexible device. These results highlight the potential of perovskite quantum dots to combine the high performance of perovskite materials with the mechanical durability needed for flexible solar applications [1].
Tandem solar cells combine multiple photovoltaic materials into a single device, with each layer absorbing a different part of the solar spectrum.
For example, a silicon bottom layer can be paired with a perovskite top layer. The perovskite absorbs high-energy light, while silicon captures lower-energy photons that pass through.
Figure 7: General illustration of a tandem solar cell, including combining a perovskite with silicon [18]
This stacking approach allows tandem cells to surpass the efficiency limits of single-material devices. In fact, multi-junction designs already hold some of the highest solar cell efficiencies ever recorded, especially in space applications where cost is less of a constraint [5].
Photovoltaics are a collection of competing and complementary approaches to the same problem: turning sunlight into electricity as efficiently, cheaply, and reliably as possible.
Silicon dominates today because it is stable and proven at scale. Thin-film technologies aim to reduce material use and enable new form factors. Organic and perovskite solar cells represent newer generations of materials that promise lower-cost manufacturing and new applications, though they are still improving in durability and performance. Quantum dots and tandem structures push the boundaries of what efficiency limits might be possible in the future.
References
Hu, L. (2021, January 20). Flexible and efficient perovskite quantum dot solar cells via hybrid interfacial architecture. nature. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-20749-1
Intal, D., & Ebong, A. A. (2026, January N/A). Thin-film solar photovoltaics: Trends and future directions Author links open overlay panel. sciencedirect. Retrieved June 21, 2026, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125011372?__cf_chl_tk=MyQ5TdHjMgMxlJUjDHLNP8l2yPHIuTJA1bEsRpaBsGE-1782065322-1.0.1.1-oSRWXKMxK3LKS2HB8V37oSW1abjvHiyrYgoybcHff.M
Kim, S., Hoang, V. Q., & Bark, C. W. (2021, November 3). Silicon-Based Technologies for Flexible Photovoltaic (PV) Devices: From Basic Mechanism to Manufacturing Technologies. PMC. Retrieved June 21, 2026, from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8617805/
Mozaffari, S., Nateghi, M. R., & Zarandi, M. B. (2017, February 15). An overview of the Challenges in the commercialization of dye sensitized solar cells. sciencedirect. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1364032116311534
Raisa, A. T., Sakib, S. N., Hossain, M. J., Rocky, K. A., & Kowsar, A. (2025, April 10). Advances in multijunction solar cells: An overview. sciencedirect. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266711312500018X
Schropp, R.E.I., Carius, R., & Beaucarne, G. (2007, March N/A). Amorphous Silicon, Microcrystalline Silicon, and Thin-Film Polycrystalline Silicon Solar Cells. researchgate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259404405_Amorphous_Silicon_Microcrystalline_Silicon_and_Thin-Film_Polycrystalline_Silicon_Solar_Cells
Sharma, K., Sharma, V., & Sharma, S. S. (2018, November 28). Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells: Fundamentals and Current Status. PMC. Retrieved June 21, 2026, from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6261913/
Torrence, C. E., Libby, C. S., Nie, W., & Stein, J. S. (2022, December 15). Environmental and health risks of perovskite solar modules: Case for better test standards and risk mitigation solutions. PMC. Retrieved June 21, 2026, from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9860350/
U.S. Department of Energy. (2026, June 17). Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaics Research. Department of Energy. Retrieved June 20, 2026, from https://www.energy.gov/cmei/systems/crystalline-silicon-photovoltaics-research
U.S. Department of Energy. (2026, June 17). Organic Photovoltaics Research. Department of Energy. Retrieved June 21, 2026, from https://www.energy.gov/cmei/systems/organic-photovoltaics-research
U.S. Department of Energy. (2026, June 17). Perovskite Solar Cells. Department of Energy. Retrieved June 21, 2026, from https://www.energy.gov/cmei/systems/perovskite-solar-cells
American Solar Energy Society. (2021, February 20). Monocrystalline Vs Polycrystalline Solar Panels | American Solar Energy Society. Ases.Org. https://ases.org/monocrystalline-vs-polycrystalline-solar-panels/
Solar, T.-F. (2023, April 25). ESS Solar. ESS Solar. https://www.esssolarpower.com/blog/thin-film-solar-panels
Uddin, A. (2022). Organic solar cells. Comprehensive Guide on Organic and Inorganic Solar Cells, 25–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-85529-7.00006-2
Zhou, Y., Herz, L. M., Alex K.-Y. Jen, & Saliba, M. (2022). Advances and challenges in understanding the microscopic structure–property–performance relationship in perovskite solar cells. Nature Energy, 7(9), 794–807. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-022-01096-5
Gamry Instruments. (2019). Dye Sensitized Solar Cells-Dye Solar Cells-DSSC-DSC. Gamry.Com. https://www.gamry.com/application-notes/physechem/dssc-dye-sensitized-solar-cells/
Kumar, P., Kumar, R., Iliev, I. K., Beloev, H. I., Praveenkumar, S., Sunnam, N., & Bhatia, A. (2025). Engineered Quantum Dot Solar Cells: From Fundamentals to Applications. Plasmonics, 20(8), 6887–6907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11468-025-02915-7
Fang, Z., Zeng, Q., Zuo, C., Zhang, L., Xiao, H., Cheng, M., Hao, F., Bao, Q., Zhang, L., Yuan, Y., Wu, W.-Q., Zhao, D., Cheng, Y., Tan, H., Xiao, Z., Yang, S., Liu, F., Jin, Z., Yan, J., & Ding, L. (2021). Perovskite-based tandem solar cells. Science Bulletin, 66(6), 621–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2020.11.006